Black Queans Are Not Strong Enough to Hold The Crown

Getty Images / Midjourney

7th-century Greek playwright Aeschylus didn't know it then, but he would describe the 21st-century bourgeoisie black woman perfectly in only eight words: "Whoever is new to power is always harsh." This is precisely why many modern black women are lashing out. Their newly-acquired power is being challenged.

The elitist-minded black woman is new to the political power game. They got a taste of it in the 1970s and 80s when cultural Marxism firmly planted its roots in American culture and, later, in the 1990s when black men were jailed and separated from their homes during the nation's War on Drugs. Marxist theory paved the way for feminism under the guise that women were oppressed, victimized, had no rights, yadda-blah, etc.

Through Lyndon B. Johnson's Great Society initiatives that prioritized the black woman over the black man, the foundation for the bourgeoisie black woman to cement her power was laid. Today, she sits on her throne as fellow sistas and simps feed into her narcissism. As a result, the word queen has regained social relevancy.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, queen refers to the wife of a king, a female monarch, or a woman eminent in rank or power. Queen is often the descriptor of choice among black women. It illustrates modern American culture's and, more acutely, black culture's lust for power.

Queen is not an endearing term. They should look up its origins.

Queen stems from the word quean. A quean is a disreputable woman. Its etymology comes from Old and Middle English, meaning "a low-born woman, female serf, hussy or prostitute."

I can hear the rebuttals now. "Vincent, are you calling all black women prostitutes?" No. But the ones who incessantly call themself a queen? Yes. A power-hungry woman and a woman who sells her body to the highest bidder operate under the same ideological framework. Both think they are in control of a given situation when, in reality, they are being exploited by someone with more power than them. 

This power dynamic adds a new wrinkle in the war against conservatives and the 2024 race for The White House.

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy continued his media blitz with an appearance on The Breakfast Club, a nationally-syndicated radio show that caters to urban and liberal audiences. The show has historically been very hostile toward Republicans or anyone who represents a threat to the establishment status quo. This interview was no different.

Most of the interview was conducted by political activist and radio host Tezlyn Figaro. After a brief internet search, I discovered that Figaro is of "African-American and Latina descent". However, there is no information on her parents. She was a former staffer for a progressive, pro-Bernie Sanders political action group called Our Revolution. She was fired and sued the organization claiming racial discrimination. Figaro is currently a political consultant for ambulance-chasing extraordinaire Ben Crump.

"Let's talk about you for a moment and let's actually talk about your policy," Tezlyn Figaro asked Vivek Ramaswamy. "Explain to me your position on this civic duty voting."

"Sure," Vivek responded. "So my position is I think that every kid who graduates from high school should know the minimums about the country that we require an immigrant to know about the country in order to become a citizen."

He continues, "...young people...very few of them vote as it stands today. Super small numbers and apparently sixty percent of them say they would rather give up their right to vote than give up TikTok. Well, I say all right. Let's take that to the next level. How about we do something that raises the voting age from 18 to 25. But you still get to vote at 18 if you just pass the same civics test that an immigrant has to pass in order to vote. And tests aren't for everybody so...then you [have to at] least serve in the military or a first responder role for 6 months."

There is nothing wrong with this idea. In fact, it needs to go farther. Every American should have to reapply for their citizenship every decade. Part of the process would be to pass a civics test. But I digress. That is not the focus of this article.

Tezlyn Figaro took Vivek back to school, literally.

"You made millions according to your uh resume off of this country, and you have absolutely not been involved in civics. One, not voting and two, let me just ask because I know you mentioned earlier you don't want to sit around at the debate and talk about accomplishments. Let's make the accomplishments pretty simple. In high school, were you ever a class president or take any leadership role? Because your opponent did. Chris Christie. He was the class president so have you ever taken any leadership at all or anything...?"

It's interesting she propped up Chris Christie because that is the exact kind of Republican the liberals want to face. Spineless, weak, uncharismatic, and politically inept. Once again, I digress.

Figaro's qualms about Vivek's presidential candidacy have nothing to do with his high school civics record, his wealth, or Chris Christie. She knows drastic changes to our voting laws could alter the country's power dynamics. The younger, more uninformed, and more impressionable the voter, the more likely they are to vote Democrat. Black women, by proxy of white liberal elites, run the Democrat party.

Over the last sixty years, bourgeoisie black women have been led to believe they are almighty when it is just wily Democrat politicians manipulating them and giving them a few dollars for their troubles. They have abandoned God's order (God, man, woman, child) in favor of corner offices at corporations, Berken bags, red-bottom heels, large mansions in ninety-nine percent white neighborhoods, and an outsized voice in the political arena. In their eyes, Barack Obama is more worthy of reverence than Yahweh. Black women have been used as foot soldiers in the white liberal conquest for communism. The black woman's vote got the Clintons, Obamas and Bidens into The White House. Their dollars helped shape popular culture in a matriarchal image. Their emotions have been exploited to stoke racial tensions to pre-Lyndon Johnson levels. Everything is rigged in favor of the black woman, and they will not give up this power without a fight.

This is why the newest Supreme Court Justice, Ketanji Brown-Jackson, deems it necessary to publicly spar with Clarence Thomas over the curtailing of affirmative action policies in college admissions.

Elitist black women understand affirmative action policies are the easiest and most guileful method of achieving political power. They can get positions they are otherwise unqualified for while continuing to cry crocodile tears of oppression. The plan is very slick and also very successful. Affirmative action is the only reason Joy Reid is a mainstay on MSNBC (she said so herself in a rare moment of clarity), Kamala Harris became Biden's VP pick, and why Ketanji Brown-Jackson sits on the highest court in the country. A person who cannot identify what a woman is should not be a judge on the Supreme Court. They should be a student in a second-grade classroom.

Clarence Thomas professionally called out KBJ's nonsense, labeling her worldview as "myopic" and full of "racial determinism." I would have called it moronic and full of shit, but that's why I'm not a Supreme Court Justice.

In her dissent against Thomas, KBJ writes, "Our country has never been colorblind." Perhaps that is true, but what is definitely true is that she nor any other wannabe elite black woman wants America to be a colorblind nation. That would require black queans to give back the power they spent sixty years to get.

Heavy is the head who wears the crown. The stiff necks of black queans cannot support that weight. They will wear their crowns straight to the grave.